2025 Revolution Run

Wednesday, January 1, 2025 8:00 AM (GMT-7) - Final results

Race info
Sport: Running
Location: Kearns, UT, United States
Start type: Individual start
Racers: 14
Laps: Time-limited
Category results: Exclude top 3 overall
Timed on: LENOVO 82BH
Timed with: Webscorer PRO 7.2
Chip timing: RFID - LLRP
RFID reader: Impinj
Updated: Friday, January 17, 2025 2:54 PM (GMT-7)
Organized by: On Hill Events
Race website: http://www.onhillevents.com

Contact organizer

Use this form to send an email to the organizer.

Your name
Your email address
Confirm email address
Message to organizer
Send

  • Race winners »
  • Half Marathon Male
  • Lap times
Page / 3
Racers per page:
Place Bib Name Affiliation Category Age Gender Lap time
1 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 0:01.5 -+0.00%100.00%49
2 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.0 +0:04.5+300.00%25.00%20
3 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.0 +0:04.5+300.00%25.00%19
4 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%23
5 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%15
6 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%18
7 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%11
8 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%16
9 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.2 +0:04.7+313.33%24.19%9
10 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.2 +0:04.7+313.33%24.19%8
11 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.2 +0:04.7+313.33%24.19%17
12 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.4 +0:04.9+326.67%23.44%14
13 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.4 +0:04.9+326.67%23.44%10
14 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:07.9 +0:06.4+426.67%18.99%13
15 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:07.9 +0:06.4+426.67%18.99%4
16 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:08.5 +0:07.0+466.67%17.65%2
17 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:09.4 +0:07.9+526.67%15.96%7
18 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:10.5 +0:09.0+600.00%14.29%6
19 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:10.8 +0:09.3+620.00%13.89%12
20 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:12.4 +0:10.9+726.67%12.10%21
21 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:12.6 +0:11.1+740.00%11.90%3
22 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:15.1 +0:13.6+906.67%9.93%1
23 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:26.9 +0:25.4+1693.33%5.58%22
24 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:39.4 +0:37.9+2526.67%3.81%5
25 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 0:46.4 +0:44.9+2993.33%3.23%38
26 168 Cevan Skinner Orem, UT  45 to 49 47 M 0:55.0 +0:53.5+3566.67%2.73%46
27 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 1:08.6 +1:07.1+4473.33%2.19%47
28 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 1:19.1 +1:17.6+5173.33%1.90%46
29 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 1:21.7 +1:20.2+5346.67%1.84%44
30 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 1:31.9 +1:30.4+6026.67%1.63%1
31 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 1:46.1 +1:44.6+6973.33%1.41%48
32 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 1:51.2 +1:49.7+7313.33%1.35%49
33 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 1:59.2 +1:57.7+7846.67%1.26%48
34 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:00.1 +1:58.6+7906.67%1.25%47
35 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:01.5 +2:00.0+8000.00%1.23%49
36 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:01.8 +2:00.3+8020.00%1.23%46
37 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:02.1 +2:00.6+8040.00%1.23%27
38 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:02.8 +2:01.3+8086.67%1.22%29
39 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:03.4 +2:01.9+8126.67%1.22%47
40 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:03.8 +2:02.3+8153.33%1.21%44
41 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.0 +2:02.5+8166.67%1.21%41
42 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.0 +2:02.5+8166.67%1.21%46
43 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:04.1 +2:02.6+8173.33%1.21%49
44 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.2 +2:02.7+8180.00%1.21%10
45 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.4 +2:02.9+8193.33%1.21%26
46 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.9 +2:03.4+8226.67%1.20%28
47 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.1 +2:03.6+8240.00%1.20%35
48 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.2 +2:03.7+8246.67%1.20%13
49 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.3 +2:03.8+8253.33%1.20%18
50 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.3 +2:03.8+8253.33%1.20%36
51 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.4 +2:03.9+8260.00%1.20%32
52 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.4 +2:03.9+8260.00%1.20%21
53 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.5 +2:04.0+8266.67%1.20%25
54 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.6 +2:04.1+8273.33%1.19%24
55 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.8 +2:04.3+8286.67%1.19%14
56 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.8 +2:04.3+8286.67%1.19%17
57 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.8 +2:04.3+8286.67%1.19%23
58 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.9 +2:04.4+8293.33%1.19%37
59 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.9 +2:04.4+8293.33%1.19%31
60 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.9 +2:04.4+8293.33%1.19%11
61 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.0 +2:04.5+8300.00%1.19%39
62 168 Cevan Skinner Orem, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:06.0 +2:04.5+8300.00%1.19%19
63 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:06.0 +2:04.5+8300.00%1.19%48
64 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:06.1 +2:04.6+8306.67%1.19%42
65 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.2 +2:04.7+8313.33%1.19%30
66 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.2 +2:04.7+8313.33%1.19%12
67 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.3 +2:04.8+8320.00%1.19%38
68 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.3 +2:04.8+8320.00%1.19%20
69 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.4 +2:04.9+8326.67%1.19%34
70 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.7 +2:05.2+8346.67%1.18%16
71 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.7 +2:05.2+8346.67%1.18%40
72 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.8 +2:05.3+8353.33%1.18%33
73 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:06.9 +2:05.4+8360.00%1.18%43
74 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:06.9 +2:05.4+8360.00%1.18%49
75 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.0 +2:05.5+8366.67%1.18%42
76 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:07.0 +2:05.5+8366.67%1.18%45
77 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.2 +2:05.7+8380.00%1.18%19
78 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.2 +2:05.7+8380.00%1.18%9
79 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:07.5 +2:06.0+8400.00%1.18%37
80 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.6 +2:06.1+8406.67%1.18%22
81 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.6 +2:06.1+8406.67%1.18%15
82 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.6 +2:06.1+8406.67%1.18%43
83 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:07.7 +2:06.2+8413.33%1.17%44
84 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:08.0 +2:06.5+8433.33%1.17%45
85 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:08.4 +2:06.9+8460.00%1.17%22
86 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:08.7 +2:07.2+8480.00%1.17%42
87 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:08.7 +2:07.2+8480.00%1.17%31
88 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:08.7 +2:07.2+8480.00%1.17%8
89 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:08.9 +2:07.4+8493.33%1.16%41
90 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:09.0 +2:07.5+8500.00%1.16%38
91 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:09.1 +2:07.6+8506.67%1.16%40
92 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.1 +2:07.6+8506.67%1.16%43
93 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.1 +2:07.6+8506.67%1.16%37
94 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:09.1 +2:07.6+8506.67%1.16%4
95 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.3 +2:07.8+8520.00%1.16%4
96 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.3 +2:07.8+8520.00%1.16%46
97 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.5 +2:08.0+8533.33%1.16%8
98 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.6 +2:08.1+8540.00%1.16%30
99 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.6 +2:08.1+8540.00%1.16%45
100 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.6 +2:08.1+8540.00%1.16%35
101 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.7 +2:08.2+8546.67%1.16%41
102 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.8 +2:08.3+8553.33%1.16%23
102 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.8 +2:08.3+8553.33%1.16%24
104 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:10.0 +2:08.5+8566.67%1.15%37
105 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.1 +2:08.6+8573.33%1.15%16
106 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:10.3 +2:08.8+8586.67%1.15%47
107 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.3 +2:08.8+8586.67%1.15%38
108 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.5 +2:09.0+8600.00%1.15%19
108 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.5 +2:09.0+8600.00%1.15%21
110 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.7 +2:09.2+8613.33%1.15%28
111 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:10.8 +2:09.3+8620.00%1.15%7
112 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.8 +2:09.3+8620.00%1.15%20
113 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:10.8 +2:09.3+8620.00%1.15%38
114 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:10.9 +2:09.4+8626.67%1.15%12
115 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.0 +2:09.5+8633.33%1.15%35
116 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:11.1 +2:09.6+8640.00%1.14%44
117 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:11.1 +2:09.6+8640.00%1.14%32
118 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.2 +2:09.7+8646.67%1.14%36
119 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:11.2 +2:09.7+8646.67%1.14%7
120 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:11.2 +2:09.7+8646.67%1.14%33
121 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.3 +2:09.8+8653.33%1.14%7
121 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.3 +2:09.8+8653.33%1.14%33
123 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.4 +2:09.9+8660.00%1.14%5
123 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.4 +2:09.9+8660.00%1.14%10
125 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:11.5 +2:10.0+8666.67%1.14%34
126 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.6 +2:10.1+8673.33%1.14%27
126 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.6 +2:10.1+8673.33%1.14%39
128 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:11.6 +2:10.1+8673.33%1.14%4
129 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:11.7 +2:10.2+8680.00%1.14%3
130 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:11.7 +2:10.2+8680.00%1.14%10
131 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:11.8 +2:10.3+8686.67%1.14%5
132 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.9 +2:10.4+8693.33%1.14%11
132 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.9 +2:10.4+8693.33%1.14%17
132 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.9 +2:10.4+8693.33%1.14%25
135 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.0 +2:10.5+8700.00%1.14%9
136 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.1 +2:10.6+8706.67%1.14%8
137 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.2 +2:10.7+8713.33%1.13%5
138 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:12.2 +2:10.7+8713.33%1.13%12
139 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:12.3 +2:10.8+8720.00%1.13%6
140 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:12.5 +2:11.0+8733.33%1.13%6
141 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:12.5 +2:11.0+8733.33%1.13%28
142 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.6 +2:11.1+8740.00%1.13%6
143 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.6 +2:11.1+8740.00%1.13%17
144 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:12.8 +2:11.3+8753.33%1.13%36
145 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:12.8 +2:11.3+8753.33%1.13%13
146 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:12.9 +2:11.4+8760.00%1.13%15
147 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:13.2 +2:11.7+8780.00%1.13%9
148 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:13.4 +2:11.9+8793.33%1.12%3
149 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.4 +2:11.9+8793.33%1.12%27
150 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:13.4 +2:11.9+8793.33%1.12%26
151 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:13.4 +2:11.9+8793.33%1.12%3
152 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.5 +2:12.0+8800.00%1.12%15
153 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.6 +2:12.1+8806.67%1.12%16
154 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.6 +2:12.1+8806.67%1.12%20
155 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:13.6 +2:12.1+8806.67%1.12%4
156 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:13.8 +2:12.3+8820.00%1.12%27
157 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.8 +2:12.3+8820.00%1.12%23
158 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.8 +2:12.3+8820.00%1.12%13
159 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.9 +2:12.4+8826.67%1.12%19
160 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:14.0 +2:12.5+8833.33%1.12%29
161 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:14.1 +2:12.6+8840.00%1.12%30
162 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.1 +2:12.6+8840.00%1.12%2
163 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:14.3 +2:12.8+8853.33%1.12%25
164 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:14.3 +2:12.8+8853.33%1.12%31
165 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:14.3 +2:12.8+8853.33%1.12%2
166 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:14.4 +2:12.9+8860.00%1.12%18
167 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.4 +2:12.9+8860.00%1.12%14
168 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.4 +2:12.9+8860.00%1.12%36
169 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.4 +2:13.0+8866.67%1.12%33
170 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:14.6 +2:13.1+8873.33%1.11%34
171 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.6 +2:13.1+8873.33%1.11%22
172 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.8 +2:13.3+8886.67%1.11%26
173 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:15.0 +2:13.5+8900.00%1.11%48
174 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.1 +2:13.6+8906.67%1.11%18
175 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:15.3 +2:13.8+8920.00%1.11%29
176 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.3 +2:13.8+8920.00%1.11%24
177 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:15.4 +2:13.9+8926.67%1.11%2
178 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.5 +2:14.0+8933.33%1.11%31
179 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:15.6 +2:14.0+8933.33%1.11%3
180 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:15.7 +2:14.2+8946.67%1.11%35
181 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.7 +2:14.2+8946.67%1.11%35
182 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.9 +2:14.4+8960.00%1.10%30
183 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.9 +2:14.4+8960.00%1.10%34
184 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:16.1 +2:14.6+8973.33%1.10%32
185 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:16.2 +2:14.7+8980.00%1.10%29
186 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:16.4 +2:14.9+8993.33%1.10%25
187 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:16.4 +2:14.9+8993.33%1.10%28
188 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:16.5 +2:15.0+9000.00%1.10%2
189 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:16.5 +2:15.0+9000.00%1.10%23
190 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:16.9 +2:15.4+9026.67%1.10%25
191 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:17.1 +2:15.6+9040.00%1.09%11
192 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:17.3 +2:15.8+9053.33%1.09%1
193 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:17.3 +2:15.8+9053.33%1.09%39
194 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:17.3 +2:15.8+9053.33%1.09%30
195 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:17.7 +2:16.2+9080.00%1.09%40
196 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:17.8 +2:16.3+9086.67%1.09%1
197 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:17.9 +2:16.4+9093.33%1.09%21
198 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:17.9 +2:16.4+9093.33%1.09%24
199 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:18.1 +2:16.6+9106.67%1.09%20
200 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:18.1 +2:16.6+9106.67%1.09%25
201 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:18.2 +2:16.7+9113.33%1.09%48
202 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:18.4 +2:16.9+9126.67%1.08%47
203 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:18.6 +2:17.1+9140.00%1.08%27
204 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:19.1 +2:17.6+9173.33%1.08%42
205 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:19.2 +2:17.7+9180.00%1.08%43
206 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:19.2 +2:17.7+9180.00%1.08%45
207 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:19.6 +2:18.1+9206.67%1.07%21
208 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:19.7 +2:18.2+9213.33%1.07%40
209 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:19.8 +2:18.3+9220.00%1.07%22
210 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:19.8 +2:18.3+9220.00%1.07%12
211 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:20.0 +2:18.5+9233.33%1.07%44
212 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:20.1 +2:18.6+9240.00%1.07%14
213 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:20.3 +2:18.8+9253.33%1.07%31
214 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:20.3 +2:18.8+9253.33%1.07%5
215 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:20.4 +2:18.9+9260.00%1.07%19
216 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:20.5 +2:19.0+9266.67%1.07%28
217 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:20.6 +2:19.1+9273.33%1.07%28
218 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:20.9 +2:19.4+9293.33%1.06%22
219 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:20.9 +2:19.4+9293.33%1.06%29
220 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:20.9 +2:19.4+9293.33%1.06%47
221 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.0 +2:19.5+9300.00%1.06%2
222 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.0 +2:19.5+9300.00%1.06%24
223 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.0 +2:19.5+9300.00%1.06%49
224 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:21.1 +2:19.6+9306.67%1.06%47
225 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.2 +2:19.7+9313.33%1.06%15
226 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:21.3 +2:19.8+9320.00%1.06%7
227 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:21.3 +2:19.8+9320.00%1.06%1
228 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:21.3 +2:19.8+9320.00%1.06%2
229 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:21.6 +2:20.1+9340.00%1.06%24
230 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.7 +2:20.2+9346.67%1.06%34
231 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.7 +2:20.2+9346.67%1.06%9
232 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:21.8 +2:20.3+9353.33%1.06%45
233 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:21.8 +2:20.3+9353.33%1.06%43
234 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.0 +2:20.5+9366.67%1.06%38
235 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.2 +2:20.7+9380.00%1.05%41
236 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:22.2 +2:20.7+9380.00%1.05%1
237 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:22.2 +2:20.7+9380.00%1.05%8
238 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.3 +2:20.8+9386.67%1.05%17
239 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.3 +2:20.8+9386.67%1.05%7
240 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.4 +2:20.9+9393.33%1.05%3
241 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:22.4 +2:20.9+9393.33%1.05%10
242 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:22.6 +2:21.1+9406.67%1.05%32
243 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:22.6 +2:21.1+9406.67%1.05%11
244 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:22.9 +2:21.4+9426.67%1.05%18
245 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.9 +2:21.4+9426.67%1.05%37
246 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:22.9 +2:21.4+9426.67%1.05%41
247 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:23.1 +2:21.6+9440.00%1.05%42
248 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:23.1 +2:21.6+9440.00%1.05%40
249 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:23.2 +2:21.7+9446.67%1.05%41
250 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:23.2 +2:21.7+9446.67%1.05%1
Page / 3
Racers per page: